The cryptocurrency landscape is continuously shaped by debates over technology, governance, and economic principles. A notable discussion occurred when economist Liu Changyong participated in an online forum to explain his rationale for supporting Bitcoin Cash (BCH) over Bitcoin (BTC) and to share his views on Ethereum (ETH). Holding a PhD in economics from Peking University, Liu began studying Bitcoin's economic challenges in 2013 and is a respected contributor in crypto circles. The discussion brought together everyday users and prominent figures to explore the technical and philosophical differences between these major digital assets.
Understanding Hard Forks and Network Upgrades
A primary topic was the nature of hard forks. Critics often argue that forks create dangerous splits, but proponents see them as essential for innovation and progress. Liu argued that the creation of Bitcoin Cash demonstrated that hard forks are not inherently risky but are a legitimate method for implementing changes when developer groups disagree.
He emphasized that a fork’s success depends on community and market support. Forks without user backing will inevitably fail, while those with pre-mining – where coins are generated for developers before public release – are unethical. In contrast, forks that address genuine technical needs and improve user experience can thrive.
👉 Explore more about blockchain upgrades
Addressing Centralization and Development Concerns
A significant portion of the discussion focused on development centralization. Liu contrasted the two approaches: Bitcoin Core’s development, which he views as dominated by a single entity ignoring user feedback, versus Bitcoin Cash’s more open and market-oriented model.
He acknowledged that while the Bitcoin ABC development team plays a leading role in BCH, other independent teams also contribute proposals and code. This multi-team environment, he argued, helps prevent centralized control and encourages diverse solutions. The key is maintaining a system where technological improvements are driven by practical market needs rather than a top-down ideology.
The Role of Miners and Market Incentives
Mining centralization and manipulation were another area of debate. Liu contended that large mining pools are inherently incentivized to act in the network's best interest, as their investments would suffer if the ecosystem failed. He specifically addressed criticism of Bitcoin Cash’s Emergency Difficulty Adjustment (EDA) algorithm.
Initially, the EDA led to unstable block times and allowed miners to switch between mining BTC and BCH based on profitability. Critics labeled this a flaw that enabled manipulation. Liu reframed it as a temporary survival mechanism that was later successfully upgraded to a more stable algorithm in response to community feedback, demonstrating the chain’s ability to adapt and improve.
Bitcoin Cash vs. Bitcoin: The Brand and The Vision
A contentious issue is the "Bitcoin" brand. Some participants accused BCH supporters of attempting to co-opt Bitcoin's identity. In response, figures like Jiang Zhuoer argued that Bitcoin Cash, with its larger block size, is closer to Satoshi Nakamoto's original vision for a peer-to-peer electronic cash system.
Liu supported this view, stating that BCH represents the economic principles outlined in the original whitepaper. He believes that as BCH gains more adoption from exchanges, wallets, and merchants, the market will ultimately decide which chain deserves the title of "Bitcoin" based on utility and stability, not just on historical precedence.
Ethereum’s Flexibility and Its Economic Model
The conversation also turned to Ethereum. Liu was asked whether ETH is too centralized, especially if its founder, Vitalik Buterin, were to leave the project. He acknowledged that Buterin holds significant influence but noted that the community efficiently reaches consensus.
However, he highlighted a fundamental economic difference: Ethereum aims to be a flexible platform for smart contracts and applications, which sometimes requires changes to its protocol. Bitcoin Cash, in contrast, aims to be a global currency with a fixed supply and a stable, secure foundation. This makes them suited for different purposes, and Liu expressed doubt that Ethereum would surpass Bitcoin in its primary role as money.
The Impact of Institutional Products like Bitcoin Futures
The potential launch of Bitcoin futures on traditional exchanges was seen as a double-edged sword. Such products could bring large inflows of capital and legitimize the asset class, potentially benefiting BTC’s price in the short term.
However, Liu also warned of the risks. The introduction of futures contracts gives large players sophisticated tools to short the market, potentially leading to increased volatility or significant price drops. This institutionalization introduces new dynamics that the originally decentralized system was not designed to handle.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Bitcoin (BTC) and Bitcoin Cash (BCH)?
The core difference lies in their scaling philosophy. BTC maintains a 1MB block size and uses off-chain solutions like the Lightning Network for scaling. BCH increased the block size to allow more on-chain transactions, aiming to be a fast and low-fee electronic cash system as originally envisioned.
Are hard forks dangerous for a blockchain network?
Hard forks are a natural mechanism for upgrading and disputing governance in decentralized systems. They are not inherently dangerous. A fork becomes viable based on its technical merits and the community support it gathers. Forks with no utility or unethical practices like pre-mining are likely to fail.
Could Ethereum (ETH) ever surpass Bitcoin in market value?
They serve different primary purposes. Ethereum is a platform for decentralized applications and smart contracts, while Bitcoin aims to be digital gold or a store of value. It's possible for ETH’s market cap to fluctuate relative to BTC's, but they are not directly competing for the same niche, making a direct "flippening" less likely.
How do Bitcoin futures affect the crypto market?
Futures contracts allow institutional investors to gain exposure to bitcoin’s price without holding the asset directly. This can increase liquidity and market maturity. However, it also introduces the potential for large-scale short selling, which can create downward pressure on the spot price and increase volatility.
Is miner centralization a threat to Bitcoin Cash?
All proof-of-work blockchains face questions about mining power distribution. Market incentives encourage miners to act in the network's long-term interest. The health of a network is determined by its resilience, the diversity of its development teams, and its broad decentralization across users, nodes, and businesses.
What is the future of smart contracts on Bitcoin Cash?
The BCH community has shown interest in expanding its functionality, including adding smart contract capabilities and sidechains like RSK. The development philosophy is typically market-driven, meaning features are added based on user demand and after thorough technical testing to ensure security and stability.