In the evolving landscape of blockchain technology, a growing number of projects are choosing to build their own public chains. This strategic shift not only broadens the utility of their native tokens but also enables these tokens to become the designated Gas Token within their ecosystems. This transformation fundamentally enhances the token’s role—from a simple medium of exchange to a core component that powers network operations, governance, and economic incentives.
This shift signifies a deeper maturation of token utility. Tokens are no longer just digital assets traded on exchanges. They are increasingly integral to transaction efficiency, network security, and community-led governance. By becoming the Gas Token, a project’s native token gains renewed purpose and value, reinforcing the project’s overall vision and sustainability.
We are witnessing a pivotal moment where tokens are evolving into essential tools for innovation and growth. Below, we explore several leading projects that have successfully adopted this model, leveraging their tokens as Gas Tokens to strengthen their market position and ecosystem impact.
DYDX: A Pioneer in Building Its Own Chain and Adopting a Gas Token
One of the most prominent examples of this trend is dYdX. Faced with high transaction costs on Ethereum, dYdX made a strategic decision to migrate away from the Ethereum network. In collaboration with StarkWare, dYdX developed its own application-specific chain, leveraging StarkWare’s scalable technology to enable faster and cheaper transactions.
A central part of this transition was designating its native token, $DYDX, as the Gas Token for the new chain. This move repositioned $DYDX from a purely governance-oriented asset to a functional utility token used for paying transaction fees. Beyond gas usage, $DYDX also plays a key role in network governance and staking mechanisms, enhancing both security and decentralization.
The market response to this shift was highly positive. On November 15, the price of $DYDX surged by over 15%, reflecting strong investor confidence in dYdX’s new direction. This successful transition has set a benchmark for other projects considering a similar path toward greater autonomy and token utility.
More Projects Following Suit: MAGIC, HOOK, APE, and Others
The strategy of converting a native token into a Gas Token is gaining momentum across the blockchain space. Here are several other projects adopting this model:
TreasureDAO (MAGIC)
TreasureDAO, a decentralized NFT ecosystem built on Arbitrum, recently announced that it would launch its own gaming-focused blockchain. The project confirmed that $MAGIC would serve as the Gas Token for this new chain. This news led to a sharp price increase, with $MAGIC rising over 30% within a week.
👉 Explore more strategies for blockchain tokenomics
Hooked Protocol (HOOK)
Hooked Protocol unveiled its HOOK 2.0 proposal, which includes plans to establish $HOOK as the Gas Token within its appchain ecosystem. This upgrade is designed to expand the token’s functionality and strengthen its role in the network’s economy.
ApeCoin (APE)
ApeCoin is exploring the development of its own Layer-2 network, tentatively named ApeChain, within the Optimism Superchain framework. Led by Ben Jones, co-founder of Optimism, the proposal considers using either $APE or a new token as the Gas Token. This move aims to improve transaction efficiency and create new revenue streams for the ApeCoin ecosystem.
IOTA (IOTA)
IOTA released the whitepaper for IOTA 2.0, introducing a new tokenomics model. The proposed system uses “Mana,” generated by holding IOTA tokens, as a form of Gas Token. This innovative approach seeks to decentralize network validation while maintaining a fixed token supply.
Frax Finance (FXS)
Sam Kazemian, founder of Frax Finance, announced that Fraxchain will be launched as a general-purpose Rollup platform rather than an application-specific chain. Various decentralized applications will be able to deploy on Fraxchain, with $FXS serving as the Gas Token. $FXS will also participate in sequencer revenue sharing and help decentralize the network’s validator set.
The Irreversible Trend and Its Implications for Web3
The shift toward project-specific blockchains and native Gas Tokens is becoming increasingly common. This trend reflects a broader movement toward greater specialization, efficiency, and economic sustainability in the blockchain industry.
By converting their tokens into Gas Tokens, projects achieve several key benefits:
- Enhanced Utility: Tokens gain consistent demand through their use in transaction fee payment.
- Economic Alignment: Token value becomes more directly tied to network usage and growth.
- Governance Integration: Gas Tokens often play a dual role in governance, increasing holder engagement.
- Reduced External Dependency: Projects gain more control over transaction costs and scalability.
This model is likely to be adopted by more projects in the future, contributing to a more diverse and resilient Web3 ecosystem.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a Gas Token?
A Gas Token is a cryptocurrency used to pay transaction fees on a blockchain network. It compensates validators or miners for processing transactions and securing the network.
Why are projects building their own blockchains?
Projects build their own chains to achieve greater scalability, reduce transaction costs, and have more control over their network’s rules and economic model. This also allows tokens to serve multiple purposes, including as Gas Tokens.
How does converting a token to a Gas Token affect its value?
This conversion can increase token demand because it is regularly used to pay for transactions. If network usage grows, the value of the token may appreciate due to increased utility and scarcity.
Can any token become a Gas Token?
In theory, yes. However, the token must be integrated into the blockchain’s consensus mechanism and economic structure. This usually requires building a new chain or significantly modifying an existing one.
What are the risks of this model?
Risks include possible regulatory challenges, technical complexity in building and maintaining a blockchain, and the need to bootstrap network security and user adoption.
Is this trend limited to large projects?
Not necessarily. While larger projects may have more resources to build a chain, layer-2 solutions and modular blockchain tech are making it easier for smaller projects to explore this option as well.