The staking sector is a cornerstone of the crypto economy, representing the largest segment by Total Value Locked (TVL). Despite this, prominent staking tokens like LDO, EIGEN, and ETHFI have struggled in the current market cycle. This analysis explores the competitive dynamics of staking and restaking protocols, using Lido on Ethereum and Solayer on Solana as primary examples to understand their business models, revenue streams, and future potential.
Understanding Staking and Restaking Fundamentals
Staking involves participants locking up cryptocurrency to support network operations, such as block validation in Proof-of-Stake (PoS) systems. In return, they receive rewards. Restaking takes this a step further by allowing already-staked assets to be reused to secure additional services or protocols, generating extra yield.
There are three primary sources of revenue in staking ecosystems:
- PoS Base Rewards: Native token issuance by the network to maintain consensus.
- Transaction Ordering Fees: Revenue from priority fees and Maximal Extractable Value (MEV) obtained during transaction processing.
- Staked Asset Leasing: Fees earned from lending staked assets to other protocols that require economic security or other services (i.e., restaking).
Ethereum's Staking Landscape: Lido, Eigenlayer, and Etherfi
Lido: The Liquid Staking Leader
Lido addresses the high barriers to entry for Ethereum staking—including hardware requirements and the 32 ETH minimum—by offering liquid staking tokens (LSTs). Users deposit ETH and receive stETH, which represents their staked position and earns rewards while remaining liquid and composable in DeFi.
Lido's revenue is derived from Ethereum's consensus layer rewards (base issuance) and execution layer rewards (priority fees and MEV). Despite the Shapella upgrade reducing the liquidity advantage of LSTs, Lido maintains a nearly 90% market share in Ethereum liquid staking due to its capital efficiency and deep liquidity.
Eigenlayer: Pioneering Restaking
Eigenlayer introduced the concept of restaking. It allows users who have already staked ETH (natively or via LSTs) to recommit their assets to secure additional services, known as Actively Validated Services (AVS). These can include oracles, data availability layers, and bridges.
Eigenlayer acts as a marketplace, connecting ETH stakers (supply) with protocols needing security (demand). However, a key question remains: Is there sufficient, sustainable demand from protocols willing to pay for security-as-a-service, especially when many have their own staking tokens? Much of the current yield is driven by token incentives rather than organic protocol fees.
Etherfi and the Rise of Liquid Restaking Tokens (LRTs)
Eigenlayer's native restaking process is complex, requiring users to manage their own validators and smart contracts (Eigenpods). Liquid Restaking Protocols like Etherfi simplified this by offering a one-click solution. Users deposit ETH, receive eETH (an LRT), and automatically gain exposure to both base Ethereum staking rewards and Eigenlayer restaking rewards.
Etherfi's success hinges on two critical factors: Lido's decision not to enter restaking directly and Eigenlayer's decision not to offer a liquid staking service. These decisions were heavily influenced by the Ethereum community's focus on avoiding consensus overload and mitigating centralization risks, as voiced by Vitalik Buterin and others. This created a market gap that LRTs filled.
Solana's Staking Model: Performance and Pragmatism
Solana's staking model is designed with a focus on high performance and scalability. Its approach differs significantly from Ethereum's, particularly with the introduction of the stake-weighted Quality of Service (swQoS) mechanism.
Jito and Liquid Staking on Solana
Similar to Lido, Jito offers liquid staking on Solana. Users deposit SOL and receive JitoSOL, which accrues staking rewards and a share of MEV revenue. The core mechanics are comparable to Ethereum's model.
The swQoS Mechanism: A Game Changer
Implemented in response to network congestion during the March meme coin craze, swQoS prioritizes transactions based on the amount of SOL a user has staked. A validator with x% of the total stake can theoretically have up to x% of its transactions prioritized during times of congestion.
This mechanism ensures network reliability for major stakers but inherently favors larger players, leading to concerns about centralization. However, it reflects Solana's pragmatic, performance-first philosophy.
Solayer: Redefining Restaking on Solana
Solayer leverages Solana's swQoS to offer a fundamentally different restaking model compared to Eigenlayer. It provides Endogenous AVS (services within the Solana ecosystem) versus Eigenlayer's Exogenous AVS (services for external systems).
Solayer's Business Model
Solayer is both a liquid staking and a restaking protocol. Users deposit SOL to receive sSOL (an LST). They can then delegate their sSOL to applications that require prioritized transaction throughput on Solana, such as DEXs during high-volume periods.
In this model, restaking isn't just about leasing economic security; it's about leasing network bandwidth and reliability. The demand for this service is directly tied to Solana's on-chain activity, making it a potentially more immediate and tangible need than abstract security services.
- Users deposit SOL into Solayer and receive sSOL.
- Solayer stakes the SOL, earning base PoS rewards.
- Users can delegate their sSOL to dApps that pay for enhanced transaction prioritization via swQoS.
Comparative Analysis: Why Solana's Model Holds Promise
When comparing the business potential of staking on Ethereum versus Solana, several key differentiators emerge:
- PoS Base Rewards: Solana's base staking yield (~6.5%) is significantly higher than Ethereum's (~3%), providing a stronger revenue baseline for all staking protocols.
- Transaction Fees & MEV (REV): Real Economic Value (REV)—the sum of transaction fees and MEV—is a key metric of chain activity and profitability. Solana's REV has shown a strong upward trend and recently surpassed Ethereum's, which declined post-EIP-4844.
- Demand for Leased Assets: Ethereum's restaking demand is currently focused on security, which is still proving its product-market fit. Solana's swQoS mechanism creates an additional, perhaps more urgent, demand for leased staking power to guarantee transaction success.
- Regulatory and Philosophical Freedom: Solana's ecosystem has more flexibility. Protocols like Jito can expand into restaking, and restaking protocols like Solayer can issue their own LSTs without the same degree of philosophical constraints faced by Ethereum-based projects.
This combination of higher base yields, growing on-chain economic activity, and a broader definition of restaking demand suggests that staking and restaking protocols on Solana operate in a more favorable environment with a higher potential ceiling.
👉 Explore advanced staking strategies
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Lido and Solayer?
Lido is primarily a liquid staking protocol on Ethereum that focuses on providing liquidity for staked ETH. Solayer, on Solana, combines liquid staking with restaking, allowing users to earn yields from base staking and from leasing their stake to apps that need transaction prioritization.
Is restaking safe?
Restaking introduces additional smart contract and slashing risks. On Eigenlayer, risks are associated with the AVSs you choose to secure. On Solayer, the risk is tied to the performance of the dApps you delegate to. Always audit the protocols and understand the risks before participating.
Why is Solana's staking APR higher than Ethereum's?
Solana has a higher inflation rate designed to reward validators and stakers more generously to secure its high-throughput network. Ethereum's issuance rate decreases as the total amount of staked ETH increases, leading to a lower yield.
Can I restake my stETH from Lido?
Yes, you can restake stETH on Eigenlayer, but you do so as a user. Lido, the protocol itself, does not capture any of the restaking fees; it only earns revenue from the base Ethereum staking rewards.
What is swQoS?
Stake-weighted Quality of Service (swQoS) is a mechanism on Solana that prioritizes network bandwidth for users and validators based on the amount of SOL they have staked. It helps maintain network performance during congestion but increases the influence of large stakers.
Will Ethereum's staking yield ever increase again?
An increase would require a significant rise in network activity (boosting transaction fee revenue) or a decrease in the total amount of staked ETH (increasing the share of rewards for remaining stakers). Both scenarios are possible but uncertain.