Ethereum's transition to Proof-of-Stake (The Merge) is approaching rapidly. With specifications being finalized and community outreach underway, it's essential to understand how this upgrade impacts the application layer. The Merge is designed to have minimal disruption on how end users, smart contracts, and dApps interact with Ethereum. However, several subtle changes are worth highlighting for developers and infrastructure operators.
Changes to Block Structure and Opcodes
After The Merge, Proof-of-Work blocks will no longer exist on the network. Instead, the contents of previous Proof-of-Work blocks become part of the blocks created on the Beacon Chain. You can think of the Beacon Chain as Ethereum's new consensus layer, replacing the previous Proof-of-Work mechanism.
Beacon Chain blocks contain ExecutionPayloads, which represent the post-merge equivalent of current Proof-of-Work blocks. For end users and application developers, these ExecutionPayloads are where interactions with Ethereum occur. Transactions at this layer will still be processed through execution layer clients like Besu, Erigon, Geth, and Nethermind.
Deprecated Mining Fields
Several fields previously included in Proof-of-Work block headers become irrelevant after The Merge. To minimize disruption to tools and infrastructure, these fields are set to zero or the equivalent for their data structures rather than being completely removed. This approach is formally specified in EIP-3675.
| Field | Constant Value | Comments |
|---|---|---|
| ommers | [] | RLP([]) = 0xc0 |
| ommersHash | 0x1DCC4DE8DEC75D7AAB85B567B6CCD41AD312451B948A7413F0A142FD40D49347 | = keccak256(rlp([])) |
| difficulty | 0 | |
| nonce | 0x0000000000000000 |
Since Proof-of-Stake doesn't naturally produce ommers (also known as uncle blocks), the list in each block will be empty, and the hash of this list will become the hash of an empty list's RLP encoding. Similarly, difficulty and nonce, being Proof-of-Work functions, will be set to zero while respecting their byte-size values.
Updated Opcodes: BLOCKHASH and DIFFICULTY
After The Merge, the BLOCKHASH opcode remains available, but the pseudo-randomness it provides will be significantly weaker since it will no longer be backed by Proof-of-Work.
Relatedly, the DIFFICULTY opcode (0x44) will be updated and renamed to PREVRANDAO. Post-merge, it will return the output of the random beacon provided by the Beacon Chain, making it more reliable than BLOCKHASH for randomness needs.
The value exposed by PREVRANDAO will be stored in the ExecutionPayload where the ommers field previously stored values related to Proof-of-Work computations. The payload's ommers field will also be renamed to prevRandao.
This change, formalized in EIP-4399, also provides applications with a method to detect whether The Merge has occurred. As stated in the EIP:
Additionally, the change proposed in this EIP allows smart contracts to determine whether the upgrade to PoS has occurred. This can be done by analyzing the return value of the DIFFICULTY opcode. A value greater than 2**64 indicates the transaction is being executed in a PoS block.
👉 Explore real-time blockchain development tools
Block Time Adjustments
The Merge affects Ethereum's average block time. Currently, under Proof-of-Work, blocks appear approximately every 13 seconds with considerable variation in actual block times. Under Proof-of-Stake, blocks appear exactly every 12 seconds unless a slot is missed due to validator offline status or failure to submit blocks in time.
This reduction of approximately one second in average block time means that smart contracts making calculations based on specific average block times will need to account for this change. Applications relying on block time assumptions should review their time-dependent logic to ensure compatibility with the new consistent block interval.
Finalized Blocks and Safe Heads
Under Proof-of-Work, there was always potential for chain reorgs. Applications typically waited for several blocks to be mined on top of a new head block before considering it sufficiently confirmed against removal from the canonical chain. After The Merge, we gain the concepts of finalized blocks and safe heads exposed at the execution layer.
Understanding Finality
Finalized blocks are those that have been accepted by >2/3 of validators. To create a conflicting block, an attacker would need to burn at least 1/3 of the total staked Ether. While stake amounts may vary, such an attack would always be expected to cost the attacker millions of ETH.
A safe head block is justified by the Beacon Chain, meaning >2/3 of validators have attested to it. Under normal network conditions, we expect it to be included in the canonical chain and eventually finalized. For this block not to become part of the canonical chain, the majority of validators would need to act maliciously, or the network would need to experience extreme latency in block propagation.
After The Merge, execution layer APIs (such as JSON-RPC) will expose the safe head using the safe tag. Finalized blocks will also be accessible through JSON-RPC via a new finalized flag. These can serve as more robust alternatives to Proof-of-Work confirmations.
| Block Type | Consensus Mechanism | JSON-RPC | Reorg Conditions |
|---|---|---|---|
| Head | Proof-of-Work | latest | Predictable, must be used with caution |
| Safe Head | Proof-of-Stake | safe | Possible, requires significant network latency or attack |
| Confirmed | Proof-of-Work | N/A | Unlikely, requires majority hash power to mine competing chain |
| Finalized | Proof-of-Stake | finalized | Extremely unlikely, requires >2/3 validators to finalize competing chain |
Note: The JSON-RPC specification is still under active development, so naming changes should still be expected.
Preparing for The Merge Transition
Application developers should prepare for these changes by testing their contracts and infrastructure on long-lived testnets. The consistent block time, updated opcodes, and new finality mechanisms represent significant improvements to Ethereum's security and predictability.
👉 Get advanced blockchain development strategies
Developers should particularly focus on:
- Updating any logic that depends on BLOCKHASH or DIFFICULTY opcodes
- Adjusting time-sensitive calculations for the new 12-second block time
- Implementing support for safe and finalized block tags in their applications
- Testing thoroughly on Merge testnets before mainnet deployment
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between Proof-of-Work and Proof-of-Stake after The Merge?
The consensus mechanism changes from mining to validation, eliminating energy-intensive mining while maintaining Ethereum's security through staked ETH. This transition reduces energy consumption by approximately 99.95% while introducing faster block times and enhanced security through finality.
How should dApp developers prepare their applications for The Merge?
Developers should test their applications on Merge testnets, update any hardcoded assumptions about block times, replace DIFFICULTY opcode usage with PREVRANDAO where appropriate, and implement support for the new safe and finalized block tags in their front-end interfaces and smart contracts.
Will gas fees change after The Merge?
The Merge itself doesn't directly address gas fees—that improvement comes with subsequent upgrades like sharding. However, the consistent 12-second block time may provide more predictable transaction inclusion, and the overall efficiency improvements may indirectly affect fee markets.
Can smart contracts detect whether they're running on PoW or PoS Ethereum?
Yes, contracts can check the return value of the DIFFICULTY opcode (which will return values above 2**64 after The Merge) or use other chain identification methods to determine whether they're operating in a Proof-of-Stake environment.
What happens to existing Proof-of-Work mining equipment after The Merge?
Ethereum mining equipment will become obsolete for Ethereum mining purposes after The Merge. Miners may repurpose their hardware for other Proof-of-Work cryptocurrencies or sell it, while the network transitions to being secured by validators staking ETH instead of computational work.
How does The Merge affect Ethereum's security model?
The security model transitions from physical hardware and electricity expenditure to economic stake. Validators must stake ETH as collateral, which can be slashed for malicious behavior. This creates strong economic incentives for honest validation while reducing Ethereum's environmental impact significantly.
The Merge represents a fundamental upgrade to Ethereum's consensus mechanism while maintaining backward compatibility for most applications. By understanding these subtle but important changes, developers can ensure their dApps continue to operate smoothly while taking advantage of Ethereum's improved security and efficiency.