Everyone talks about "gasless" Ethereum transactions because no one enjoys paying gas fees. However, the Ethereum network operates precisely because transactions are paid. So, how can transactions be "gasless"? What's the trick behind this?
In this article, we explore the mechanism behind "gasless" transactions. You'll discover that while there's no such thing as a free lunch on Ethereum, there are innovative ways to redistribute gas costs.
By applying the knowledge shared here, your users can save significant gas, enjoy a better user experience, and even enable novel delegation patterns within your smart contracts.
Let's dive in.
Understanding the Concept
At its core, a "gasless" transaction involves using a private key to sign a smart contract operation off-chain without incurring any gas costs. This signature can then be handed to another party, who can execute the transaction on the signer's behalf.
The signing function is typically an extension of a regular contract method, incorporating additional signature parameters. For example, while a standard ERC20 approve function appears as:
function approve(address usr, uint wad) external returns (bool)A permit function (which achieves the same outcome via signatures) includes extra parameters:
function permit(address holder, address spender, uint256 nonce, uint256 expiry, bool allowed, uint8 v, bytes32 r, bytes32 s) externalBoth functions modify the same allowance mapping, but the permit approach enables the approval to happen without the token holder directly submitting a transaction.
The Role of EIP Standards
The implementation relies heavily on established Ethereum Improvement Proposals (EIPs). EIP-712 provides a standard for structuring hashed and signed messages, while EIP-2612 specifically applies this standard to create a permit function for ERC20 tokens that matches the behavior of approve.
These standards ensure interoperability and security by defining how signatures should be constructed and verified. For developers, this means you can often inherit already-audited implementations rather than building from scratch.
Key Components of the Signature System
Three main elements work together to make off-chain signatures secure and functional:
1. DOMAIN_SEPARATOR
This value uniquely identifies the smart contract. It is a hash constructed from the token's name, version, chain ID, and contract address. This ensures signatures are only valid for a specific contract on a specific network.
2. PERMIT_TYPEHASH
This is a hash of the function name and all its parameter types. It clearly identifies the intended function for the signature, preventing reuse in different contexts.
3. Nonce Mechanism
Each address has a nonce—a number that increments with each used signature. This ensures every signature is only valid once, protecting against replay attacks.
How the Permit Function Works
The permit function accepts multiple parameters: the holder, spender, nonce, expiry timestamp, approval boolean, and the signature components (v, r, s).
First, it reconstructs the digest (the signed data hash) using the provided parameters and the contract's DOMAIN_SEPARATOR. It then recovers the signer's address using ecrecover. If the recovered address doesn't match the holder, the signature is rejected.
The function then checks:
- Whether the current time is before the expiry (if one is set)
- Whether the provided nonce matches the holder's current nonce
If all checks pass, the allowance is updated accordingly, and an Approval event is emitted.
Creating Off-Chain Signatures
Generating a valid signature involves three steps:
- Generate the DOMAIN_SEPARATOR using the contract's name, version, chain ID, and address.
- Create the digest by combining the DOMAIN_SEPARATOR with the hashed permit parameters (holder, spender, nonce, expiry, allowed).
- Sign the digest using the holder's private key.
This process happens entirely off-chain, requiring no gas. The resulting signature can be passed to any party, who can then submit it to the blockchain via the permit function.
Benefits and Use Cases
This pattern offers several advantages:
- Gas Cost Shifting: The entity submitting the transaction bears the gas cost, not the original signer. This can significantly improve user experience in dApps.
- Enhanced Delegation: Smart contracts can implement more sophisticated authorization patterns, allowing for temporary or limited permissions.
- Meta-Transactions: Users can interact with contracts without needing ETH for gas, as third parties can relay their signed messages.
👉 Explore advanced token standards
Frequently Asked Questions
What is a gasless transaction?
A gasless transaction allows a user to authorize an action without submitting an on-chain transaction themselves. Instead, they sign a message off-chain, and another party pays the gas to execute it.
Is EIP-2612 widely adopted?
Yes, many major ERC20 tokens, including Uniswap and USDC, have implemented EIP-2612. Its standardization ensures secure and consistent behavior across contracts.
Can signatures be reused?
No. Each signature includes a nonce and is tied to a specific contract and function. Once used, the nonce increments, invalidating previous signatures.
What happens if a signature expires?
If an expiry parameter is set and the current block timestamp exceeds it, the permit call will revert. This prevents stale signatures from being executed.
Are there any risks with off-chain signatures?
The main risk is signature replay across different chains or contracts, which the DOMAIN_SEPARATOR and nonce mechanisms prevent. Always use audited code from trusted sources.
How can I implement this in my token?
You can inherit from open-source implementations that comply with EIP-2612. Ensure thorough testing and consider professional audits for production deployments.
Conclusion
"Gasless" transactions don't eliminate gas costs but instead redistribute them to other parties. By using off-chain signatures and the permit pattern, developers can significantly enhance user experience and enable new functionality.
The security of this system relies on robust cryptographic practices and careful implementation of EIP standards. When done correctly, it provides a powerful tool for building more accessible and flexible decentralized applications.