Blockchain technology has created waves globally by transforming art, music, videos, and in-game items into digital assets. Its emergence has caught regulators in Asia somewhat off guard. Many are adopting a wait-and-see approach—but for how long? And what lies ahead?
India
Non-fungible tokens (NFTs) have gained significant popularity worldwide in recent years, and India is no exception. Earlier this year, several of India’s largest cryptocurrency exchanges launched their own NFT marketplaces. These platforms, built on blockchains created by the exchanges themselves, provide end-to-end trading environments for artists and buyers using cryptocurrency as the medium of exchange.
Many questions remain regarding the future of NFTs in India and the validity of NFT transactions. A major reason is the uncertain legal status of cryptocurrencies. In 2018, the Reserve Bank of India (RBI) issued a circular prohibiting banks from dealing with entities engaged in virtual currency transactions. However, the Supreme Court of India struck down this ban in 2020.
In early 2021, the Ministry of Finance indicated that the government was open to experimentation with blockchain, Bitcoin, and cryptocurrency. By May, the RBI had issued another circular instructing banks to conduct due diligence on virtual currency transactions in line with existing anti-money laundering (AML), foreign exchange controls, and counter-terrorism financing regulations. Still, the full legality of cryptocurrencies and crypto-assets remains to be clarified through further government and regulatory guidance.
No specific laws currently regulate NFTs in India. As a result, legal interpretation relies on established principles from existing statutes.
Intellectual Property Considerations
An NFT often represents a digital copy or token of an underlying original work. However, owning an NFT does not automatically grant ownership of the original work. Copyrights are not transferred unless explicitly stated in a written agreement, as required under the Copyright Act of 1957.
Rights and obligations in NFT sales are typically determined by sales contracts. Many NFT transactions are executed through smart contracts, which specify licensing terms, automatic royalty payments on resales, copyright limitations, and tracking of subsequent NFT purchases.
Smart contracts are subject to the Indian Contract Act of 1872 and the Information Technology Act of 2000. While smart contracts include elements like offer and acceptance, the use of cryptocurrency as consideration raises questions due to its ambiguous legal standing.
Regulatory Classification and Compliance
The classification of NFTs is essential for determining compliance. If an NFT represents an asset classified as a security under Indian securities law, it would fall under the purview of the Securities Contracts Regulation Act (SCRA). Some legal experts argue that NFTs could be considered derivatives under the SCRA.
Derivatives are only legally valid if traded on recognized exchanges. If NFTs are classified as derivatives, their trade in unauthorized markets could be deemed illegal. However, most NFT marketplaces function as platforms rather than exchanges, which complicates regulatory oversight.
Taxation and Cross-Border Issues
NFTs may be subject to Goods and Services Tax (GST), depending on the nature of the underlying asset. Cross-border NFT transactions add another layer of complexity. The Finance Act of 2020 introduced an equalisation levy, imposing a 2% fee on foreign e-commerce operators transacting with Indian customers.
Additionally, the Foreign Exchange Management Act (FEMA) may apply to cross-border NFT transactions, depending on how the underlying asset is classified. Enforcing these regulations is challenging due to the difficulty in tracing NFT ownership and location.
Money laundering is another concern. The anonymity and privacy offered by blockchain can make it difficult to track parties involved in illicit activities. While IP addresses and wallet information can sometimes be traced, the process is often slow and cumbersome.
Future Outlook
Despite these uncertainties, NFTs are gaining traction in India, particularly among artists seeking new avenues for monetization. The government is expected to introduce new cryptocurrency legislation, which may provide much-needed clarity for NFTs as well.
Until then, stakeholders must rely on existing legal frameworks while advocating for regulations that address the unique challenges posed by this emerging technology.
👉 Explore more regulatory strategies
Indonesia
The recent rise of NFTs has also found fertile ground in Indonesia. A local media entertainment startup, for instance, created a digital artwork inspired by the Baduy tribe and sold it as an NFT. This novel form of tokenization, verified via blockchain, remains unregulated—attracting artists but also raising practical and legal concerns.
Indonesia’s legal system appears open to blockchain innovation. Recent regulations suggest a trend toward cautious acceptance rather than outright prohibition. The 2020 Indonesian Standard Industrial Classification (KBLI) officially recognizes blockchain development as a legitimate business activity. Blockchain-based support services for peer-to-peer lending are also permitted.
Cryptocurrency occupies a unique position. Bank Indonesia, the central bank, prohibits the use of virtual currencies, including cryptocurrencies, in payment transactions. However, the government allows cryptocurrencies to be traded as commodities on futures markets under the supervision of the Commodity Futures Trading Regulatory Agency (Bappebti).
NFTs are not explicitly regulated under Indonesia’s current crypto-asset framework. Their non-fungible nature distinguishes them from cryptocurrencies, as their value is often set by the owner rather than the market. This necessitates a different regulatory approach.
Intellectual Property Challenges
Proving ownership of intellectual property is critical under Indonesian copyright law. The creator of the original work—not the NFT owner—typically retains copyright unless explicitly transferred. If an NFT creator mints an NFT using copyrighted material without permission, they may face legal action for infringement, which can result in imprisonment or fines.
Jurisdictional issues also arise due to the decentralized nature of blockchain. Copyright protection generally applies only if the work is within Indonesian jurisdiction or covered by an international treaty.
NFT Marketplaces and Payment Systems
Most NFT transactions globally use cryptocurrency. However, Indonesian law mandates the use of the rupiah for all transactions. Some local NFT marketplaces have adopted traditional payment methods to avoid legal issues.
Foreign NFT platforms serving Indonesian consumers may still be subject to local regulations. Government Regulation No. 80 of 2019 requires foreign electronic system operators that meet certain thresholds in traffic, transaction volume, or value to comply with Indonesian law. This includes business licensing, taxation, and consumer protection requirements.
Platforms like CertiK provide smart contract auditing services, but Indonesia lacks specific regulations for identity verification on blockchain. Electronic system providers are generally required to implement measures preventing system abuse, disruptions, or losses.
The Road Ahead
NFTs could be integrated into Indonesia’s legal system through special recognition, similar to the approach taken with P2P lending. The government might establish a regulatory sandbox to assess the reliability of blockchain in NFT transactions.
Digital businesses, including NFT platforms, must also comply with general obligations for electronic system providers. Registration with the Ministry of Communication and Informatics is mandatory for all platforms serving Indonesian users. Additionally, digital goods and services are subject to taxation.
As Indonesia’s digital economy grows, NFT participants should stay informed about evolving regulations and seek legal advice to ensure compliance.
Japan
NFTs have taken Japan by storm, capturing attention in art, gaming, and sports. Since April 2021, NFT marketplaces have emerged, and companies have launched initiatives around collectibles, sports memorabilia, and blockchain gaming. This trend is expected to continue.
Legal Status of NFTs
Japan lacks specific NFT regulations. NFTs may be classified as securities under the Financial Instruments and Exchange Act if they involve profit distribution. If they function as payment methods, they might be regarded as crypto-assets or prepaid payment instruments under the Payment Services Act.
However, if no monetary exchange occurs, NFTs likely fall outside financial regulations. NFTs used as rewards or prizes are subject to the Act against Unjustifiable Premiums and Misleading Representations. Using NFTs in gambling activities is prohibited.
Ownership and Copyright Issues
Under the Japanese Civil Code, only tangible objects can be owned. Since NFTs are intangible digital data, they cannot be owned in the traditional sense. Purchasing an NFT does not grant ownership of the underlying asset.
Similarly, buying an NFT does not automatically transfer copyright. The Copyright Act grants exclusive rights to the original author. Unless specified in a contract, NFT holders cannot reproduce or publicly transmit the work. How buyers can use NFTs depends on the terms agreed upon with the creator or platform.
Practical Considerations
Creators must ensure they do not infringe on third-party rights when minting NFTs. Unauthorized use of copyrighted material or personal likenesses can lead to legal claims.
Buyers should carefully review licensing terms before purchasing NFTs. They should also be aware that similar or identical NFTs may exist on other platforms.
Marketplace operators need clear terms of use, robust security measures, and contingency plans for service continuity. In August 2021, a security breach at an NFT platform highlighted the importance of cybersecurity.
While NFTs offer exciting opportunities, their legal framework is still evolving. Stakeholders should monitor developments and consult legal experts to navigate this complex landscape.
👉 Get advanced compliance methods
Philippines
The Bangko Sentral ng Pilipinas (BSP) describes NFTs as tools representing unique virtual or physical assets, distinct from traditional cryptocurrencies. Unlike fungible currencies, each NFT is unique, tied to specific digital art, music, or in-game items.
Globally, NFTs have gained popularity through platforms like OpenSea and even major auction houses. In the Philippines, play-to-earn games like Axie Infinity have driven NFT adoption. Players use NFT-based characters to earn cryptocurrency, which can be exchanged for fiat currency.
Regulatory Oversight
NFTs used solely within game ecosystems are not considered virtual assets under BSP regulations. However, platforms facilitating the exchange between fiat and cryptocurrency fall under BSP oversight as virtual asset service providers (VASPs). Those allowing NFTs as payment for goods or services are further classified as payment system operators.
The Securities and Exchange Commission (SEC) may also have jurisdiction. If an NFT project meets the criteria of an investment contract under the Howey Test, it must comply with securities regulations. The SEC has already taken action against schemes promising returns from NFT-based investments.
Tax obligations apply regardless of regulatory classification. The Bureau of Internal Revenue requires individuals and entities earning income from digital transactions, including NFT sales, to register and pay taxes.
Intellectual Property and Jurisdiction
NFT ownership does not automatically transfer copyright. Unauthorized use of protected content can lead to infringement claims. The decentralized nature of NFTs also raises jurisdictional challenges, though foreign platforms serving Filipino users may still be subject to local laws.
Despite regulatory gaps, authorities are exploring adaptive approaches, such as regulatory sandboxes, to foster innovation while protecting public interests.
Taiwan
NFTs have sparked lively discussion in Taiwan, though no specific regulations exist yet. Their legal treatment depends on case-by-case analysis under existing laws.
Securities and Financial Laws
NFTs representing unique assets like digital art or collectibles are unlikely to be classified as securities. However, their investment-like characteristics mean financial regulations could still apply in some cases.
Rights of NFT Holders
Ownership of an NFT does not guarantee ownership of the underlying asset. Buyers should carefully review terms to understand what rights they are acquiring. Creators and platforms must avoid overpromising to prevent civil or consumer disputes.
Marketplace operators should conduct due diligence to avoid liability for infringing content. Agreements between creators and platforms should clearly define responsibilities.
Intellectual Property Issues
Using copyrighted material without permission can lead to infringement claims. All parties must ensure that NFT creation and sales do not violate third-party rights.
Metaverse and NFTs
NFTs are seen as key components of the metaverse—a virtual world accessible via AR or VR technologies. In gaming, NFTs could enable true ownership of in-game assets across platforms. However, this would require changes to existing licensing agreements and collaboration between publishers.
Anti-Money Laundering Compliance
Recent amendments to anti-money laundering laws include virtual currency platforms and transactions. Whether NFTs fall under these regulations depends on whether they are classified as virtual currencies. If so, marketplace operators may need to implement AML measures like KYC checks and suspicious activity reporting.
Compliance could significantly increase costs for NFT participants. Industry stakeholders should monitor regulatory developments closely.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is an NFT?
An NFT, or non-fungible token, is a unique digital asset stored on a blockchain. It represents ownership or proof of authenticity of a specific item, often digital art, music, or collectibles.
Are NFTs legal in Asia?
Yes, but regulations vary by jurisdiction. Some countries, like Japan and the Philippines, have begun incorporating NFTs into existing frameworks, while others, like India and Indonesia, are still evaluating comprehensive regulations.
Do I own the copyright if I buy an NFT?
No. Unless explicitly stated in a written agreement, purchasing an NFT does not transfer copyright ownership. You may only own a token representing the work, not the work itself.
How are NFTs taxed?
NFT transactions may be subject to income tax, goods and services tax, or other levies depending on the jurisdiction and the nature of the transaction. Consult local tax authorities for specific guidance.
What are the risks of buying NFTs?
Rights ambiguity, copyright infringement, market volatility, and regulatory changes are common risks. Always research the creator, platform terms, and applicable laws before purchasing.
Can NFTs be used for money laundering?
Due to their pseudonymous nature, NFTs could be misused for money laundering. Regulators in several jurisdictions are evaluating AML requirements for NFT marketplaces.