The Ethereum network's Merge, which occurred on September 15, 2022, fundamentally changed the value proposition of ETH. This transition to Proof-of-Stake (PoS) has made long-term ETH holding more attractive for investors due to several key factors.
Why the Merge Made ETH More Valuable
The shift to Proof-of-Stake consensus brought significant economic changes to Ethereum:
- Reduced ETH Issuance: The most immediate on-chain impact was a dramatic decrease in ETH issuance rate. By moving away from energy-intensive mining, Ethereum significantly reduced the amount of new ETH created with each block. Combined with the EIP-1559 fee burn mechanism, this creates potential for Ethereum to become deflationary over time.
- Enhanced Staking Incentives: Post-Merge, Ethereum generates revenue from transaction fees (tips in gas fees), which provides incremental income for stakers and institutional investors. This creates strong motivation to stake ETH, removing it from circulation and building substantial price support.
These changes have encouraged more long-term holding of ETH, as investors anticipate price appreciation from reduced issuance and increased staking demand. The growing staking activity has benefited the entire Ethereum staking economy, making it essential to understand the services and infrastructure supporting this ecosystem.
Understanding the Ethereum Merge
The Merge represents the most significant event in Ethereum's history. While Ethereum launched in 2015 with Proof-of-Work like Bitcoin, its ultimate goal was always to transition to Proof-of-Stake once the technology was proven.
To ensure a smooth transition, developers launched the Beacon Chain as a separate parallel network. "The Merge" refers to the event when this Beacon Chain merged with the main Ethereum chain, completing the transition to Proof-of-Stake without any network downtime.
Post-Merge Ethereum consists of two main components:
- Execution Layer: Handles transaction processing, smart contract execution, and maintains the current state of all Ethereum data
- Consensus Layer: Implements the Proof-of-Stake algorithm that enables network agreement on validated data
Why Proof-of-Stake Matters
Proof-of-Work served Ethereum well but had significant drawbacks, particularly its massive energy consumption. The transition to Proof-of-Stake reduced Ethereum's energy usage by an estimated 99.98%, making network participation accessible to anyone with a standard laptop rather than requiring specialized mining hardware.
Key Participants in the Proof-of-Stake Economy
The staking economy consists of a rich ecosystem of participants working to secure the network. Understanding these players helps stakers make informed decisions about their participation strategy.
Node Management Services
Nodes are devices running Ethereum client software that store, send, and receive data. Multiple nodes connected together form the network. There are three primary types of Ethereum nodes:
- Full Nodes: Maintain a complete copy of the blockchain data, verify transactions and blocks, and contribute to network security. Requires significant hardware resources and bandwidth.
- Light Nodes: Store only block header information and rely on full nodes for specific data requests. Use minimal resources while still interacting with the blockchain.
- Archive Nodes: Contain complete historical data since the genesis block, valuable for services like block explorers and analytics platforms but requiring substantial storage capacity.
Validators are specialized nodes (either full or archive nodes) that participate in consensus by proposing and attesting to blocks. To become a validator, users must stake 32 ETH and run three software components: an execution client, consensus client, and validator client.
Web3 developers need node infrastructure to build and run decentralized applications. They typically choose between three approaches:
- Running their own nodes
- Using centralized node infrastructure providers
- Utilizing decentralized node infrastructure networks
Running Your Own Node
Operating your own node requires maintaining physical hardware with 24/7 internet connectivity and stable power.
Advantages:
- Receive full staking rewards
- Enhance network decentralization and security
- Maintain complete control over funds
Challenges:
- Significant technical knowledge required
- Substantial capital investment (32 ETH)
- Ongoing maintenance and troubleshooting responsibility
Centralized Node Infrastructure Providers
Services like Infura and Alchemy provide node infrastructure that abstracts away the complexity of running individual nodes. However, most centralized providers rely heavily on major cloud services like AWS, Google Cloud, and Microsoft Azure.
Advantages:
- Cost-effective for small projects
- Quick deployment and easy scaling
- Reduced technical barriers
Risks:
- Centralization of power among few providers
- Vulnerability to censorship (as seen with Tornado Cash sanctions)
- Single points of failure - if AWS experiences outages, dependent dApps also go offline
Decentralized Node Infrastructure Networks
Projects like Pocket Network and Ankr distribute workload across multiple independent devices rather than relying on central servers.
Advantages:
- Enhanced resilience - network continues operating even if some nodes fail
- Improved privacy - data distributed across multiple points
- Geographic optimization - nodes can be placed near user concentrations
Challenges:
- Higher maintenance complexity
- Potentially lower transaction throughput due to consensus requirements
Despite technical challenges, decentralized infrastructure aligns better with Web3's vision of a fairer, more resilient internet without centralized control points.
Staking-as-a-Service Providers
The 32 ETH requirement, technical complexity of running validator nodes, and extended lock-up periods have prevented many ETH holders from participating in staking directly. Staking-as-a-Service providers address these barriers by handling validator setup, maintenance, and operations.
Validators play a crucial role in maintaining and securing blockchain networks, similar to miners in Proof-of-Work systems. They process transactions, confirm validity, and create new blocks, earning rewards from two primary sources:
- Transaction fees: Standard fees included in crypto transactions
- Protocol rewards: Newly issued tokens based on network inflation rates
Different Proof-of-Stake networks use various consensus mechanisms, but most employ stake-weighted voting where validators with larger stakes have greater influence on network decisions.
Comparing Staking Service Providers
Staking services generally fall into three categories: liquid staking platforms, centralized exchange staking, and staking pools. According to Dune Analytics data, liquid staking commands the largest market share at approximately 33% of all staked ETH.
Liquid Staking Providers
Liquid staking protocols allow users to earn staking rewards while maintaining liquidity by issuing derivative tokens representing their staked assets.
Key Benefits:
- Eliminates opportunity cost by enabling participation in DeFi with staked assets
- Avoids unbonding periods through instant liquidity
- Diversifies risk across multiple validators
The liquid staking sector has grown significantly, with over $8.3 billion in ETH currently staked through these protocols. Lido dominates this space with approximately $5.8 billion in staked ETH, followed by Rocket Pool at $273 million.
👉 Explore advanced staking strategies
Slashing Risks and Mitigation
Slashing is a penalty mechanism that discourages malicious validator behavior by permanently removing a percentage of their staked ETH. Liquid staking protocols mitigate this risk by distributing stakes across multiple validators.
Leading Liquid Staking Protocols
Lido: Validator Selection Mechanism
Lido maintains a whitelist of professional node operators and uses a community-owned scorecard to track performance. While criticized for potential centralization, Lido has implemented measures to enhance decentralization:
- Distributed Validator Technology: Groups validators into committees that collectively propose and attest to blocks
- Node Operator Scoring: Implements metrics-based scoring to determine stake allocation
Lido's business model charges 10% of staking rewards, split evenly between node operators and protocol treasury.
Rocket Pool: Decentralized Alternative
Rocket Pool enables more accessible validator participation by requiring only 16 ETH per validator node, with the remaining 16 ETH crowdsourced from stakers.
Two participant groups:
- Node Operators: Provide 16 ETH plus RPL collateral, earning staking rewards, commissions, and RPL incentives
- Stakers: Deposit any amount of ETH (minimum 0.01 ETH) to receive rETH tokens representing their stake
This model significantly lowers barriers to becoming a node operator while maintaining security through RPL collateral requirements.
Swell Network: Permissionless Innovation
Swell Network introduces several innovations to enhance decentralization:
- Atomic Deposits: Direct staking with chosen node operators with minimum 1 ETH
- swETH: Liquid staking token representing staked ETH 1:1
- swNFT: Contains metadata for reward calculation and validator information
- SSV Integration: Reduces node operation requirement to just 1 ETH per validator using Distributed Validator Technology
Centralized Exchange Staking
Exchanges like Binance, Kraken, and Coinbase offer convenient staking services but come with significant tradeoffs:
- Custodial Risk: Users don't control their private keys
- Limited Flexibility: Typically longer lock-up periods and no DeFi integration
- Reduced Governance: Users delegate voting rights to the exchange
While some exchanges have introduced liquid staking tokens (like Binance's bETH), these solutions still maintain centralized control.
Staking Pools
Staking pools combine multiple validators to increase reward consistency and accessibility. Similar to mining pools in Proof-of-Work systems, they allow smaller stakeholders to participate collectively.
Advantages:
- Lower entry barriers
- Reduced maintenance requirements
- Professional node operation
Drawbacks:
- Less transparency compared to smart contract-based solutions
- Centralized management of user funds
The Trend Toward Permissionless Models
Both node management services and staking providers serve as critical infrastructure for the PoS economy by lowering participation barriers and promoting decentralization. The space continues evolving toward more permissionless models as communities increasingly prioritize censorship resistance and reduced reliance on centralized cloud providers.
New entrants like Swell Network demonstrate ongoing innovation in making staking more accessible while maintaining security and decentralization. As the ecosystem matures, we can expect continued refinement of tokenomics and validator selection mechanisms to balance efficiency with distributed network control.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is liquid staking?
Liquid staking allows you to earn rewards on staked assets while maintaining liquidity through derivative tokens that represent your staked position. These tokens can be used across DeFi ecosystems for additional yield opportunities.
How does the Merge affect ETH issuance?
The Merge reduced ETH issuance by approximately 90% by eliminating mining rewards. Combined with EIP-1559 fee burning, this creates potential for ETH to become deflationary during periods of high network activity.
What are the risks of staking?
Primary risks include slashing penalties for validator misbehavior, technical failures, and potential lock-up periods during which staked assets cannot be accessed or transferred.
How do I choose a staking provider?
Consider factors like security practices, fees, decentralization level, track record, and the flexibility offered by their solution. Always research whether the provider uses smart contracts or custodial approaches.
What is the minimum amount needed for staking?
This varies by platform. Some liquid staking protocols accept very small amounts (0.01 ETH), while solo staking requires 32 ETH. Staking pools often have intermediate requirements.
Can I lose money by staking?
While staking generates rewards, the value of your staked assets can still fluctuate with market conditions. There's also risk of slashing if using validator services that perform poorly or act maliciously.