In the world of cryptocurrency derivatives, traders often encounter two primary types of contracts: quarterly futures and perpetual swaps. While both serve as tools for speculation and hedging, they differ significantly in structure, cost, and risk management. Understanding these differences is crucial for making informed trading decisions.
At its core, a quarterly futures contract has a fixed expiration date, upon which it must be settled or closed. In contrast, a perpetual swap lacks an expiration date, allowing positions to remain open indefinitely—provided sufficient margin is maintained to avoid liquidation. This fundamental distinction leads to variations in fee structures, pricing mechanisms, and operational flexibility.
Understanding Funding Rates
One of the most significant differences between perpetual swaps and quarterly futures lies in the funding rate mechanism. Perpetual swaps employ funding fees to tether their prices closely to the underlying spot market. These fees are exchanged between long and short traders periodically, typically every eight hours, to balance market imbalances.
If the funding rate is positive, long positions pay short positions. Conversely, a negative rate means shorts pay longs. The calculation is straightforward: Funding Fee = Position Value × Funding Rate. This system ensures that perpetual contract prices align with spot prices, but it can also increase trading costs.
👉 Explore real-time funding rate tools
In trending markets, where biases toward long or short positions are strong, traders often find themselves consistently paying funding fees. This recurring cost can erode profits and even increase liquidation risks if fees are deducted from margin balances. For example, a trader holding a short position worth 180,000 USDT might pay 7.2 USDT in funding fees during a negative rate period.
Operational Flexibility and Holding Periods
Quarterly futures require mandatory closure upon expiration, which can be a double-edged sword. If a position is underwater at expiry, the trader must close it, potentially realizing a loss. This lack of flexibility can be frustrating, especially if market conditions might have improved given more time.
Perpetual swaps, however, offer greater flexibility. Traders can maintain positions indefinitely as long as margin requirements are met. This allows for more strategic decision-making, such as waiting out temporary downturns or riding long-term trends without the pressure of an expiration date.
Pricing Mechanisms: Mark Price vs. Last Traded Price
To mitigate the risk of market manipulation and anomalous price spikes (e.g., "wick" events), both contract types often use a mark price for calculating profits, losses, and liquidation levels. The mark price is derived from a composite of spot prices across multiple exchanges, ensuring stability and fairness.
While the formula for mark price is similar—typically, Mark Price = Spot Index Price + Moving Average Basis—the actual values may differ between perpetual swaps and quarterly futures due to variations in basis rates. For instance, an ETH perpetual swap might have a mark price of 1814.14, while its quarterly futures counterpart could be 1813.81.
👉 Get advanced mark price insights
This subtle difference can impact liquidation thresholds and profit calculations, making it essential for traders to understand which pricing mechanism their exchange uses for each contract type.
Risk Management: Auto-Deleveraging vs. Socialized Losses
Another critical distinction lies in how exchanges handle extreme market events. Quarterly futures on some platforms may use a "socialized loss" mechanism. If a trader’s position incurs losses exceeding their margin (a "flash crash" scenario), profitable traders on the same platform share the loss proportionally.
Perpetual swaps typically employ auto-deleveraging (ADL) or similar systems to isolate risk. Losses are contained within the affected position without impacting other traders. This approach reduces systemic risk but may involve forced liquidations during high volatility.
Which Contract Is More Cost-Effective?
The choice between perpetual swaps and quarterly futures depends on your trading strategy, risk tolerance, and market outlook:
- In trending markets: Quarterly futures with longer durations (e.g., quarterly expiries) may be preferable to avoid recurring funding fees.
- For flexibility: Perpetual swaps are ideal if you need to hold positions long-term or manage trades actively without expiration constraints.
- For risk management: Perpetual swaps avoid socialized losses, while quarterly futures may offer more predictable costs outside funding fees.
Ultimately, neither contract is universally "more划算" (cost-effective). Each serves different needs, and savvy traders often use both depending on market conditions.
Frequently Asked Questions
What is the main difference between perpetual swaps and quarterly futures?
Perpetual swaps have no expiration date and use funding fees to anchor prices to spot markets. Quarterly futures expire on a set date and require mandatory settlement, but they lack funding fees.
How do funding rates affect my trading costs?
Funding fees are periodic payments between long and short traders. In biased markets, you may consistently pay these fees, increasing overall costs and potentially raising liquidation risks if margins are depleted.
Can I hold a perpetual swap position forever?
Yes, as long as you maintain sufficient margin to avoid liquidation. However, funding fees may accumulate over time, impacting profitability.
Which contract is better for beginners?
Perpetual swaps offer more flexibility, but quarterly futures can be simpler due to the absence of funding rate complexities. Beginners should start with small positions and understand the risks of both.
Do all exchanges use the same pricing mechanism?
No. Some exchanges use mark prices for both contract types, while others use last traded prices for futures. Always check your exchange’s documentation to avoid surprises.
How can I avoid liquidation from funding fee deductions?
Monitor funding rates regularly and ensure your margin balance is sufficient to cover fees without pushing your position closer to liquidation levels.
In summary, both perpetual swaps and quarterly futures have distinct advantages and drawbacks. Your choice should align with your trading goals, market analysis, and risk management strategy. By understanding these instruments deeply, you can optimize your approach to derivative trading.